Dr. Alexander Aghayan & Associates, Inc.
Attorneys at Law
Patent and Trademark Agents
83, Sarhang Sakhaee Avenue
Tehran 11354, Iran
Tel: +98 (21) 6670-5056
Fax: +98 (21) 6670-4858
        +98 (21) 6672-4328
aghayan@dpimail.net
(Read Terms and Conditions before using this site)
 

White House Press Release

To The Congress Of The United States:


The White House  
Office of the Press Secretary  
_____________________________  

 

  For Immediate Release                               May 14, 1997  
  To The Congress Of The United STATES:  
  

       I hereby report to the Congress on developments since the 

  last Presidential report of November 14, 1996, concerning the 

  national emergency with respect to Iran that was declared in 

  Executive Order 12170 of November 14, 1979.  This report is 

  submitted pursuant to section 204(c) of the International 

  Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1703(c) (Ieepa).  

  This report covers events through March 31, 1997.  My last 

  report, dated November 14, 1996, covered events through 

  September 16, 1996.

  

       1.  The Iranian Assets Control Regulations, 31 Cfr 

  Part 535 (Iacr), were amended on October 21, 1996 (61 Fed. 

  Reg. 54936, October 23, 1996), to implement section 4 of 

  the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 

  1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act 

  of 1996, by adjusting for inflation the amount of the civil 

  monetary penalties that may be assessed under the Regulations.   

  The amendment increases the maximum civil monetary penalty 

  provided in the Regulations from $10,000 to $11,000 per 

  violation.

  

       The amended Regulations also reflect an amendment to 

  18 U.S.C. 1001 contained in section 330016(1)(L) of Public 

  Law 103-322, September 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.  Finally, 

  the amendment notes the availability of higher criminal fines 

  for violations of Ieepa pursuant to the formulas set forth 

  in 18 U.S.C. 3571.  A copy of the amendment is attached.

  

       2.  The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (the 

  "Tribunal"), established at The Hague pursuant to the Algiers 

  Accords, continues to make progress in arbitrating the claims 

  before it.  Since the period covered in my last report, the 

  Tribunal has rendered eight awards.  This brings the total 

  number of awards rendered to 579, the majority of which have 

  been in favor of U.S. claimants.  As of March 24, 1997, the 

  value of awards to successful U.S. claimants from the Security 

  Account held by the Nv Settlement Bank was $2,424,959,689.37.

  

       Since my last report, Iran has failed to replenish the 

  Security Account established by the Algiers Accords to ensure 

  payment of awards to successful U.S. claimants.  Thus, since 

  November 5, 1992, the Security Account has continuously remained 

  below the $500 million balance required by the Algiers Accords. 

  As of March 24, 1997, the total amount in the Security Account 

  was $183,818,133.20, and the total amount in the Interest 

  Account was $12,053,880.39.  Therefore, the United States 

  continues to pursue Case A/28, filed in September 1993, to 

  require Iran to meet its obligation under the Algiers Accords 

  to replenish the Security Account.  Iran filed its Rejoinder 

  on April 8, 1997.

  

       The United States also continues to pursue Case A/29 to 

  require Iran to meets its obligation of timely payment of its 

  equal share of advances for Tribunal expenses when directed to 

  do so by the Tribunal.  The United States filed its Reply to 

  the Iranian Statement of Defense on October 11, 1996.

  

                                 more



  

       	    	      	   	     	       	    	 (Over)



                                  2

  

       Also since my last report, the United States appointed 

  Richard Mosk as one of the three U.S. arbitrators on the 

  Tribunal.  Judge Mosk, who has previously served on the 

  Tribunal and will be joining the Tribunal officially in 

  May of this year, will replace Judge Richard Allison, who 

  has served on the Tribunal since 1988.

  

       3.  The Department of State continues to pursue other 

  United States Government claims against Iran and to respond 

  to claims brought against the United States by Iran, in 

  coordination with concerned government agencies.

  

       On December 3, 1996, the Tribunal issued its award 

  in Case B/36, the U.S. claim for amounts due from Iran under 

  two World War Ii military surplus property sales agreements.  

  While the Tribunal dismissed the U.S. claim as to one of the 

  agreements on jurisdictional grounds, it found Iran liable for 

  breach of the second (and larger) agreement and ordered Iran 

  to pay the United States principal and interest in the amount 

  of $43,843,826.89.  Following payment of the award, Iran 

  requested the Tribunal to reconsider both the merits of the 

  case and the calculation of interest; Iran's request was 

  denied by the Tribunal on March 17, 1997.

  

       Under the February 22, 1996, agreement that settled the 

  Iran Air case before the International Court of Justice and 

  Iran's bank-related claims against the United States before 

  the Tribunal (reported in my report of May 17, 1996), the 

  United States agreed to make ex gratia payments to the families 

  of Iranian victims of the 1988 Iran Air 655 shootdown and a fund 

  was established to pay Iranian bank debt owed to U.S. nationals.  

  As of March 17, 1997, payments were authorized to be made to 

  surviving family members of 125 Iranian victims of the aerial 

  incident, totaling $29,100,000.00.  In addition, payment of 

  28 claims by U.S. nationals against Iranian banks, totaling 

  $9,002,738.45 was authorized.

  

       On December 12, 1996, the Department of State filed 

  the U.S. Hearing Memorial and Evidence on Liability in 

  Case A/11.  In this case, Iran alleges that the United States 

  failed to perform its obligations under Paragraphs 12-14 of 

  the Algiers Accords, relating to the return to Iran of assets 

  of the late Shah and his close relatives.  A hearing date has 

  yet to be scheduled.

  

       On October 9, 1996, the Tribunal dismissed Case B/58,

  Iran's claim for damages arising out of the U.S. operation of 

  Iran's southern railways during the Second World War.  The 

  Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction over the claim under 

  Article Ii, paragraph two, of the Claims Settlement Declaration.

  

       4.  Since my last report, the Tribunal conducted two 

  hearings and issued awards in six private claims.  On 

  February 24-25, 1997, Chamber One held a hearing in a dual 

  national claim, G.E. Davidson v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, 

  Claim No. 457.  The claimant is requesting compensation for real 

  property that he claims was expropriated by the Government of 

  Iran.  On October 24, 1996, Chamber Two held a hearing in 

  Case 274, Monemi v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, also 

  concerning the claim of a dual national.

  

       On December 2, 1996, Chamber Three issued a decision in

  Johangir & Jila Mohtadi v. The Islamic Republic of Iran (Awd 

  573-271-3), awarding the claimants $510,000 plus interest for 

  Iran's interference with the claimants' property rights in real 

  property in Velenjak.  The claimants also were awarded $15,000 

  in costs.  On December 10, 1996, Chamber Three issued a decision 

  in Reza Nemazee v. The Islamic Republic of Iran (Awd 575-4-3), 

  



                                 more



                                  3

  

  dismissing the expropriation claim for lack of proof.  On 

  February 25, 1997, Chamber Three issued a decision in Dadras 

  Int'l v.  The Islamic Republic of Iran (Awd 578-214-3), 

  dismissing the claim against Kan Residential Corp. for failure 

  to prove that it is an "agency, instrumentality, or entity 

  controlled by the Government of Iran" and dismissing the claim 

  against Iran for failure to prove expropriation or other 

  measures affecting property rights.  Dadras had previously 

  received a substantial recovery pursuant to a partial award.  

  On March 26, 1997, Chamber Two issued a final award in Case 389, 

  Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran Air 

  Force (Awd 579-389-2), awarding Westinghouse $2,553,930.25 plus 

  interest in damages arising from the Iranian Air Force's breach 

  of contract with Westinghouse.

  

       Finally, there were two settlements of claims of dual 

  nationals, which resulted in awards on agreed terms.  They 

  are Dora Elghanayan, et al. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran 

  (Aat 576-800/801/802/803/804-3), in which Iran agreed to pay 

  the claimants $3,150,000, and Lilly Mythra Fallah Lawrence v. 

  The Islamic Republic of Iran (Aat 577-390/391-1), in which Iran 

  agreed to pay the claimant $1,000,000.

  

       5.  The situation reviewed above continues to implicate 

  important diplomatic, financial, and legal interests of the 

  United States and its nationals and presents an unusual 

  challenge to the national security and foreign policy of the 

  United States.  The Iranian Assets Control Regulations issued 

  pursuant to Executive Order 12170 continue to play an important 

  role in structuring our relationship with Iran and in enabling 

  the United States to implement properly the Algiers Accords.   

  I shall continue to exercise the powers at my disposal to deal 

  with these problems and will continue to report periodically 

  to the Congress on significant developments.

  

       	    	      	   	     William J. Clinton

  
  The White House, 

  May 13, 1997.  
  
Send mail to webmaster@aghayan.com with questions or comments about this web site.  Copyright © 2007 Alexander Aghayan & Assoc, Inc.
Last modified: 04/27/07